Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 49 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hale v. Tallapoosa County.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hale v. Tallapoosa County Anchor | green | “a person acting under color of state law.” | 18 |
| 2 | Hale v. Tallapoosa County | green | “of some right, privilege, or immunity secured by the constitution or laws of the united states.” | 16 |
| 3 | Hollingsworth v. Dixon | green | “generally, the departments and subordinate entities of municipalities, counties, and towns that are not separate legal entities or bodies do not have the capacity to sue or be sued in the absence of specific statutory authority.” | 15 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.