Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 49 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kloian v. Domino's Pizza, LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kloian v. Domino's Pizza, LLC Anchor | green | “the existence and interpretation of a contract are questions of law reviewed de novo.” | 25 |
| 2 | Walbridge Aldinger Co. v. Walcon Corp. | green | “an agreement to settle a pending lawsuit is a contract and is to be governed by the legal principles applicable to the construction and interpretation of contracts.” | 14 |
| 3 | Pakideh v. Franklin Commercial Mortgage Group, Inc. | green | “before a contract can be completed, there must be an offer and acceptance.” | 7 |
| 4 | Eerdmans v. Maki | green | “the manifestation of willingness to enter into a bargain, so made as to justify another person in understanding that his assent to that bargain is invited and will conclude it.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.