Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 48 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Villano v. City of Boynton Beach.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Villano v. City of Boynton Beach Anchor | green | “ultimately, the computation of a fee award is necessarily an exercise of judgment, because 'there is no precise rule or formula for making these determinations.” | 18 |
| 2 | Loranger v. Stierheim | green | “the fee applicant bears the burden of establishing entitlement to an award and documenting the appropriate hours expended and hourly rates.” | 13 |
| 3 | Ivonne E. Galdames vs N & D Investment Corp. | green | “must exercise their own billing judgment to exclude any hours that are excessive, redundant, or otherwise unnecessary.” | 10 |
| 4 | Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe | green | “inadequate documentation may result in a reduction in the number of hours claimed, as will a claim for hours that the court finds to be excessive or unnecessary.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.