Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 49 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Albunio v. City of New York.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Albunio v. City of New York Anchor | green | “broadly in favor of discrimination plaintiffs, to the extent that such a construction is reasonably possible” | 23 |
| 2 | Albunio v. City of New York | green | “we must construe administrative code 8-107 (7), like other provisions of the city's human rights law, broadly in favor of discrimination plaintiffs, to the extent that such a construction is reasonably possible” | 4 |
| 3 | Russo v. New York Presbyterian Hospital | green | “a general civility code, and petty slights and trivial inconveniences are not actionable.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.