Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 49 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Searls.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Searls Anchor | green | “is bound to accept factual determinations of the trial court made during the suppression hearing so long as they are supported by competent and credible evidence.” | 16 |
| 2 | State v. Moore | green | “for a search or seizure to be reasonable under the fourth amendment, it must be based upon probable cause and executed pursuant to a warrant.” | 14 |
| 3 | State v. Searls | green | “the court of appeals is bound to accept factual determinations of the trial court made during the suppression hearing so long as they are supported by competent and credible evidence.” | 10 |
| 4 | State v. Smith | green | “the evaluation of evidence and the credibility of witnesses are issues for the trier of fact.” | 5 |
| 5 | State v. Smith | green | “at a suppression hearing, the evaluation of evidence and the credibility of witnesses are issues for the trier of fact.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.