Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 48 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sullivan v. Hudson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sullivan v. Hudson Anchor | green | “deviation from the court's remand order in the subsequent administrative proceedings is itself legal error, subject to reversal on further judicial review.” | 44 |
| 2 | Donald Stacy v. Carolyn Colvin | green | “the law of the case doctrine and rule of mandate apply to social security administrative remands from federal court in the same way they would apply to any other case.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.