Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 48 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Prescott.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Prescott Anchor | green | “clearly lost its way and created such a manifest miscarriage of justice that the conviction must be reversed and a new trial ordered.” | 19 |
| 2 | State v. Wynder, Unpublished Decision (11-10-2003) | green | “a manifest weight of the evidence challenge contests the believability of the evidence presented.” | 15 |
| 3 | State v. Shaw, 21880 (3-21-2008) | green | “a sufficiency of the evidence argument challenges whether the state has presented adequate evidence on each element of the offense to allow the case to go to the jury or to sustain the verdict as a matter of law.” | 14 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.