Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 48 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Steven R. Lovasz v. Scig Supt. Donald T. Vaughn.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Steven R. Lovasz v. Scig Supt. Donald T. Vaughn Anchor | green | “the time during which a properly filed application for state post-conviction or other collateral review with respect to the pertinent judgment or claim is pending shall not be counted toward any period of limitation under this subsection.” | 12 |
| 2 | Henry Fahy v. Martin Horn | green | “state prisoners therefore must file their state claims promptly and properly under state law in order to preserve their right to litigate constitutional claims that are more than one year old in federal court.” | 11 |
| 3 | William Caswell v. Joseph Ryan (Superintendent) Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania | green | “should be strictly adhered to because it expresses respect for our dual judicial system.” | 8 |
| 4 | Toulson v. Beyer | green | “the habeas petitioner bears the burden of proving that he has exhausted available state remedies.” | 7 |
| 5 | Crews v. Horn | green | “while it usually is within a district court's discretion to determine whether to stay or dismiss a mixed petition, staying the petition is the only appropriate course of action where an outright dismissal could jeopardize the timeliness of a collateral attack.” | 5 |
| 6 | Paul Satterfield v. Philip L. Johnson the District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania | green | “has in some extraordinary way been prevented from asserting his rights;” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.