Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 8 cases, quoted by 47 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Nwokoro.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Nwokoro Anchor | green | “include written findings of fact and a written statement of the reasons for the detention” | 15 |
| 2 | United States v. Singleton, Carlos T. | green | “a person awaiting trial on a federal offense may either be released on personal recognizance or bond, conditionally released, or detained,” | 6 |
| 3 | United States v. Hubbard | green | “the court is free to use in its analysis any evidence or reasons relied on by the magistrate judge, but it may also hear additional evidence and rely on its own reasons.” | 6 |
| 4 | United States v. Henry | green | “the court reviews de novo whether there are conditions of release that will reasonably assure the safety of any other person and the community.” | 6 |
| 5 | United States v. Carlos Peralta, A/K/A Jose Matos | green | “a clear and legally sufficient basis for the court's determination” | 5 |
| 6 | United States v. Antonio Dominguez and Roberto Rodriguez | green | “meet a 'burden of production' by coming forward with some evidence that he will not flee or endanger the community if released.” | 3 |
| 7 | United States v. Hir | green | “in a presumption case such as this, a defendant bears a limited burden of production-not a burden of persuasion-to rebut that presumption by coming forward with evidence he does not pose a danger to the community or a risk of flight.” | 3 |
| 8 | United States v. Hunt | green | “for which review is requested in accordance with this rule may be accepted, modified, set aside, or recommitted to the magistrate judge with instructions, after de novo review by the chief judge.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.