Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 canonical passages across 10 cases, quoted by 1,227 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Tackett v. Apfel.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tackett v. Apfel Anchor | green | “taking into consideration the claimant's residual functional capacity, age, education, and work experience.” | 337 |
| 2 | Bray v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | green | “may not substitute its judgment for the commissioner's.” | 148 |
| 3 | Anne J. Holohan v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissionerof Ssa | green | “cannot affirm the commissioner's decision 'simply by isolating a specific quantum of supporting evidence.” | 146 |
| 4 | Robbins v. Social Security Administration | green | “more than a mere scintilla of evidence but less than a preponderance; it is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” | 134 |
| 5 | Trevizo v. Berryhill | green | “established a two-step analysis for determining the extent to which a claimant's symptom testimony must be credited.” | 91 |
| 6 | Jasim Ghanim v. Carolyn W. Colvin | green | “if the claimant meets the first test and there is no evidence of malingering, the alj can only reject the claimant's testimony about the severity of the symptoms if she gives specific, clear and convincing reasons for the rejection.” | 85 |
| 7 | Gordon Stout v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration | green | “the burden of showing that an error is harmful normally falls upon the party attacking the agency's determination.” | 82 |
| 8 | Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. Colvin | green | “(1) the record has been fully developed and further administrative proceedings would serve no useful purpose; (2) the alj has failed to provide legally sufficient reasons for rejecting evidence, whether claimant testimony or medical opinion; and (3) if the improperly discredited…” | 75 |
| 9 | Kathryn L. Benecke v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security Administration | green | “generally when a court of appeals reverses an administrative determination, 'the proper course, except in rare circumstances, is to remand to the agency for additional investigation or explanation.” | 74 |
| 10 | Keyser v. Commissioner Social Security Administration | green | “engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which . . . has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months.” | 55 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.