Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 48 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. Dickie.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. Dickie Anchor | green | “quantum of evidence sufficient to persuade a rational fair-minded person the premise is true.” | 10 |
| 2 | Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. Dickie | green | “sufficient to persuade a rational fair-minded person the premise is true.” | 10 |
| 3 | Merriman v. Cokeley | green | “disturb findings of fact supported by substantial evidence even if there is conflicting evidence.” | 10 |
| 4 | Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. Dickie | green | “a quantum of evidence sufficient to persuade a rational fair-minded person the premise is true.” | 8 |
| 5 | Quinn v. Cherry Lane Auto Plaza, Inc. | green | “appellate courts do not hear or weigh evidence, find facts, or substitute their opinions for those of the trier-of-fact.” | 6 |
| 6 | Merriman v. Cokeley | green | “a reviewing court may not disturb findings of fact supported by substantial evidence even if there is conflicting evidence.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.