Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 47 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Resorts International, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Resorts International, Inc. Anchor | green | “matters that affect the interpretation, implementation, consummation, execution, or administration of the confirmed plan will typically have the requisite close nexus.” | 20 |
| 2 | William R. McCorkle and Jeane D. McCorkle v. The First Pennsylvania Banking and Trust Company | green | “must be alert to avoid overstepping their limited grants of jurisdiction.” | 7 |
| 3 | Lisa M. KIRKLAND, Debtor. Educational Credit Management Corporation v. Lisa M. Kirkland | green | “if it is a cause of action created by the bankruptcy code, and which lacks existence outside the context of bankruptcy.” | 5 |
| 4 | Russ Pye v. United States | green | “therefore, in order for a bankruptcy court to hear and determine any matter, it must have subject matter jurisdiction . . ., statutory authority . . ., and constitutional authority.” | 5 |
| 5 | Standish v. Jackson (In re Albertson) | green | “simply because the proceeding presents questions of state law does not necessarily mean that the proceeding is 'non-core' or otherwise beyond the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy courts.” | 5 |
| 6 | Harvey v. Dambowsky (In re Dambowsky) | green | “therefore, in order for a bankruptcy court to hear and determine any matter, it must have subject matter jurisdiction . . ., statutory authority . . ., and constitutional authority.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.