Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 47 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Diversey Corp. v. Chem-Source Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Diversey Corp. v. Chem-Source Corp. Anchor | green | “the gravamen of an unfair trade practice is a misleading, false, or deceptive statement made knowingly in connection with the sale of goods or services.” | 19 |
| 2 | Stevenson v. Louis Dreyfus Corp. | green | “the 'knowingly made' requirement is met if a party was actually aware that the statement was false or misleading when made, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have been aware that the statement was false or misleading.” | 15 |
| 3 | Lohman v. Daimler-Chrysler Corp. | green | “generally speaking, the upa is designed to provide a remedy against misleading identification and false or deceptive advertising.” | 9 |
| 4 | Stevenson v. Louis Dreyfus Corp. | green | “after defining an unfair trade practice, the statute then ... lists examples of conduct which may constitute an unfair trade practice.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.