Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 47 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Belton.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Belton Anchor | green | “the evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom are viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, disregarding any evidence and inferences contrary to the verdict.” | 17 |
| 2 | State v. Oliver | green | “in the absence of a statutory definition, words will be given their plain and ordinary meaning as derived from the dictionary.” | 14 |
| 3 | State v. Miller | green | “this is not an assessment of whether the court believes that the evidence at trial established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt but rather a question of whether, in light of the evidence most favorable to the state, any rational fact-finder could have found the essential elements…” | 6 |
| 4 | State v. Vandevere | green | “in reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence in a court-tried criminal case, the appellate court's role is limited to a determination of whether the state presented sufficient evidence from which a trier of fact could have reasonably found the defendant guilty.” | 4 |
| 5 | State v. Whitfield | green | “culminated in an entirely new theory, the absence of which would have cast considerable doubt on the sufficiency of the evidence in the case” | 3 |
| 6 | State v. Salter | green | “reversal is not warranted unless there is a very strong showing that there was an abuse of discretion resulting in prejudice.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.