Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 47 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Laughlin v. Schriro.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Laughlin v. Schriro Anchor | green | “objective seriousness of the deprivation should also be measured 'by reference to the effect of delay in treatment.” | 14 |
| 2 | Timothy Barr v. Rebecca Pearson | green | “mere difference of opinion over matters of expert medical judgment or a course of medical treatment fails to rise to the level of a constitutional violation.” | 12 |
| 3 | Charles Hamner v. Danny Burls | green | “must show more than negligence, more even than gross negligence,” | 11 |
| 4 | Timothy Barr v. Rebecca Pearson | green | “have no right to receive a particular or requested course of treatment,” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.