Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 47 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Briley v. Farabow.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Briley v. Farabow Anchor | green | “an abuse of discretion is a decision manifestly unsupported by reason or one so arbitrary that it could not have been the result of a reasoned decision.” | 22 |
| 2 | Briley v. Farabow | green | “manifestly unsupported by reason or one so arbitrary that it could not have been the result of a reasoned decision.” | 18 |
| 3 | Moore v. Proper | green | “when a trial court's determination relies on statutory interpretation, our review is de novo because those matters of statutory interpretation necessarily present questions of law.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.