Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 47 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Montgomery v. Louisiana.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Montgomery v. Louisiana Anchor | green | “a state may remedy a miller violation by permitting juvenile homicide offenders to be considered for parole, rather than by resentencing them.” | 27 |
| 2 | Montgomery v. Louisiana | green | “allowing those offenders to be considered for parole ensures that juveniles whose crimes reflected only transient immaturity-and who have since matured-will not be forced to serve a disproportionate sentence in violation of the eighth amendment.” | 14 |
| 3 | State Of Washington v. Brian Ronquillo | green | “is the functional equivalent of a life sentence” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Bassett | green | “in the context of juvenile sentencing, article i, section 14 provides greater protection than the eighth amendment.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.