Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 46 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Pruitt.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Pruitt Anchor | green | “different standards apply to a motion to dismiss based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction under rule 12(b)(1) and a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under rule 12(b)(6).” | 23 |
| 2 | City of Albuquerque v. United States Department of the Interior | green | “motions to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction generally take one of two forms: (1) a facial attack on the sufficiency of the complaint's allegations as to subject matter jurisdiction; or (2) a challenge to the actual facts upon which subject matter jurisdiction is b…” | 19 |
| 3 | Sullins v. American Medical Response of Oklahoma, Inc. | green | “in waiving sovereign immunity, the legislature restricted the waiver only to the extent and in the manner prescribed in the act.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.