Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 46 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority Anchor | green | “the critical consideration is the overall effect of the statute on both local and interstate activity.” | 13 |
| 2 | New Energy Co. of Indiana v. Limbach | green | “prohibits economic protectionism - that is, regulatory measures designed to benefit in-state economic interests by burdening out-of-state competitors.” | 12 |
| 3 | C & a Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown | green | “discrimination against interstate commerce in favor of local business or investment is per se invalid, save in a narrow class of cases in which the municipality can demonstrate, under rigorous scrutiny, that it has no other means to advance a legitimate local interest.” | 12 |
| 4 | New Energy Co. of Indiana v. Limbach | green | “regulatory measures designed to benefit in-state economic interests by burdening out-of-state competitors.” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.