Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 46 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Scheidler.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Scheidler Anchor | green | “presumes that general allegations embrace those specific facts that are necessary to support the claim.” | 15 |
| 2 | Eloy Rojas Mamani v. Jose Carlos Sanchez Berzain | green | “following the supreme court's approach in iqbal, we begin by identifying conclusory allegations in the complaint.” | 12 |
| 3 | Eloy Rojas Mamani v. Jose Carlos Sanchez Berzain | green | “the possibility that - if even a possibility has been alleged effectively - these defendants acted unlawfully is not enough for a plausible claim.” | 9 |
| 4 | William H. Mack, Jr. v. City of High Springs | green | “possess enough heft to set forth 'a plausible entitlement to relief.” | 7 |
| 5 | William H. Mack, Jr. v. City of High Springs | green | “to survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' ... that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.