Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 46 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Nwaebo v. Hawk-Sawyer.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nwaebo v. Hawk-Sawyer Anchor | green | “must allege that the defendant was personally involved in the alleged deprivation of federal rights.” | 14 |
| 2 | Richard Allgeier, Maria D. Boldrick, Intervening v. United States | green | “ftca clearly provides that the united states is the only proper defendant in a suit alleging negligence by a federal employee.” | 11 |
| 3 | Richard Allgeier, Maria D. Boldrick, Intervening v. United States | green | “failure to name the united states as defendant in an ftca suit results in a fatal lack of jurisdiction.” | 9 |
| 4 | Richard Allgeier, Maria D. Boldrick, Intervening v. United States | green | “the ftca clearly provides that the united states is the only proper defendant in a suit alleging negligence by a federal employee.” | 8 |
| 5 | Nwaebo v. Hawk-Sawyer | green | “a complaint must allege that the defendants were personally involved in the alleged deprivation of federal rights.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.