Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 46 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Estate of Tori Carter Brenda Chambers v. City of Detroit, Donald Hollins, Lieutenant.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Estate of Tori Carter Brenda Chambers v. City of Detroit, Donald Hollins, Lieutenant Anchor | green | “(1) whether, considering the allegations in a light most favorable to the party injured, a constitutional right has been violated, and (2) whether that right was clearly established.” | 34 |
| 2 | Caudill v. Hollan | green | “is one of the many cases where, if the right is clearly established, the conduct at issue would also be objectively unreasonable,” | 8 |
| 3 | Amanda York Beaty and Nancie York Gunter v. United States | green | “the record is complete, and it would be a waste of everyone's time to remand to the district court what can be decided now as a matter of law” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.