Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 46 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Querubin v. Thronas.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Querubin v. Thronas Anchor | green | “the circuit court's grant or denial of summary judgment de novo.” | 21 |
| 2 | Querubin v. Thronas | green | “we review the circuit court's grant or denial of summary judgment de novo.” | 15 |
| 3 | Henderson v. Professional Coatings Corp. | green | “a party opposing a motion for summary judgment cannot discharge his or her burden by alleging conclusions, 'nor is the party entitled to a trial on the basis of a hope that the party can produce some evidence at that time.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.