Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 45 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rashidi v. American President Lines.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rashidi v. American President Lines Anchor | green | “equitable tolling applies principally where the plaintiff is actively misled by the defendant about the cause of action or is prevented in some extraordinary way from asserting his rights.” | 17 |
| 2 | Teemac v. Henderson | green | “the party who invokes equitable tolling bears the burden of proof.” | 11 |
| 3 | Rashidi v. American President Lines | green | “garden variety claim of excusable neglect” | 7 |
| 4 | Teemac v. Henderson | green | “rare and exceptional circumstances.” | 5 |
| 5 | Shidler v. Alarm Security Group, LLC | green | “acted diligently and the delay concerns extraordinary circumstances.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.