Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 45 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from CONSTANCE P. MERCER, Debtor. AT&T UNIVERSAL CARD SERVICES v. CONSTANCE P. MERCER.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CONSTANCE P. MERCER, Debtor. AT&T UNIVERSAL CARD SERVICES v. CONSTANCE P. MERCER Anchor | green | “requires little of the creditor.” | 10 |
| 2 | First National Bank v. O'Brien (In re O'Brien) | green | “largely a question of foreseeability.” | 8 |
| 3 | State of Tex. v. American Tobacco Co. | green | “if the evidence shows that the loss was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the plaintiff's reliance.” | 7 |
| 4 | CONSTANCE P. MERCER, Debtor. AT&T UNIVERSAL CARD SERVICES v. CONSTANCE P. MERCER | green | “an issuer usually will be able to establish actual reliance by showing it would not have approved the loan in the absence of debtor's promise.” | 6 |
| 5 | Manheim Automotive Financial v. Hurst | green | “the greater the distance between the reliance claimed and the limits of the reasonable, the greater the doubt about reliance in fact.” | 5 |
| 6 | Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. Perry (In Re Perry) | green | “willful blindness' does not provide a defense to an action brought under 523(a)(2)(a) and may instead be used as a factor indicative of fraud.” | 5 |
| 7 | Mid-S. Maint., Inc. v. Burk (In re Burk) | green | “a debtor who recklessly disregards the truth has the requisite wrongful intent for his actions to constitute actual fraud.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.