Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 45 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Dugan v. Rank.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dugan v. Rank Anchor | green | “the judgment sought would expend itself on the public treasury or domain, or interfere with the public administration,” | 14 |
| 2 | Dugan v. Rank | green | “the general rule is that a suit is against the sovereign if 'the judgment sought would expend itself on the public treasury or domain, or interfere with the public administration,' or if the effect of the judgment would be 'to restrain the government from acting, or to compel it…” | 13 |
| 3 | Dugan v. Rank | green | “the general rule is that a suit is against the sovereign if the judgment sought would expend itself on the public treasury or domain, or interfere with the public administration, or if the effect of the judgment would be to restrain the government from acting, or to compel it to…” | 12 |
| 4 | In Re Grand Jury: In Re Ivis Long Visitor, Witness. In Re Angie Long Visitor, Witness. In Re Joanna Ledeaux, Witness | green | “the extension by congress of federal jurisdiction to crimes committed on indian reservations inherently includes every aspect of federal criminal procedure applicable to the prosecution of such crimes.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.