Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 45 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp. Anchor | green | “the law that would be applied by state courts in the state in which the federal diversity court sits.” | 24 |
| 2 | Quimby v. Becovic Management Group, Inc. | green | “multiple legal theories supporting relief on account of one transaction must be litigated at one go.” | 5 |
| 3 | Hilliard v. Jacobs | green | “the same general evidence would be used to adjudicate all of the claims.” | 4 |
| 4 | Wabash Valley Power Association, Inc. v. Rural Electrification Administration | green | “multiple legal theories supporting relief on account of one transaction must be litigated at one go.” | 3 |
| 5 | Van Bibber v. Norris | green | “conversion is a continuing tort, lasting as long as the person entitled to the use and possession of his property is deprived of it.” | 3 |
| 6 | Microvote General Corp. v. Indiana Election Commission | green | “a party is not allowed to split a cause of action, pur- suing it in a piecemeal fashion and subjecting a defendant to needless multiple suits.” | 3 |
| 7 | Microvote General Corp. v. Indiana Election Commission | green | “the test for making the claim-splitting determination is whether identical evidence will support the issues involved in both ac- tions.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.