Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 45 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Eric H. Deravin, III v. Bernard Kerik, Commissioner, and New York City Department of Corrections.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eric H. Deravin, III v. Bernard Kerik, Commissioner, and New York City Department of Corrections Anchor | green | “as a precondition to filing a title vii claim in federal court, a plaintiff must first pursue available administrative remedies and file a timely complaint with the eeoc.” | 26 |
| 2 | Eric H. Deravin, III v. Bernard Kerik, Commissioner, and New York City Department of Corrections | green | “in determining whether claims are reasonably related, the focus should be on the factual allegations made in the eeoc charge itself, describing the discriminatory conduct about which a plaintiff is grieving.” | 12 |
| 3 | Josefina Legnani v. Alitalia Linee Aeree Italiane, S.P.A. | green | “claims that were not asserted before the eeoc may be pursued in a subsequent federal court action if they are 'reasonably related' to those that were filed with the agency.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.