Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 45 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Perez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Perez Anchor | green | “we are obliged to affirm the trial court's ruling if the result was legally correct for any reason.” | 20 |
| 2 | State v. Bennett | green | “failure to satisfy either prong of the strickland test is fatal to an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.” | 18 |
| 3 | State v. Perez | green | “legally correct for any reason.” | 4 |
| 4 | State v. Perez | green | “obliged to affirm the trial court's ruling if the result was legally correct for any reason” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.