Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 45 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Adame v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adame v. State Anchor | green | “with testimony that a bb gun is capable of causing serious bodily injury, it is reasonable for a jury to make a deadly weapon finding.” | 13 |
| 2 | Ex Parte Cavazos | green | “the 'most serious' offense is the offense of conviction for which the greatest sentence was assessed.” | 8 |
| 3 | Ex Parte Hawkins | green | “allowable unit of prosecution.” | 7 |
| 4 | Ex Parte Pena | green | “the outcome of a case will not depend on the coincidence of the order of offenses in an indictment or jury charge.” | 5 |
| 5 | Ex Parte Cravens | green | “punishment assessed makes the burglary with intent to commit theft conviction the 'most serious' offense,” | 5 |
| 6 | Landers v. State | green | “when a defendant is convicted in a single criminal action of two offenses that are the 'same' for double jeopardy purposes, the remedy is to vacate one of the convictions.” | 4 |
| 7 | Landers v. State | green | “the supreme court has directed that when a defendant is convicted in a single criminal action of two offenses that are the 'same' for double jeopardy purposes, the remedy is to vacate one of the convictions.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.