Topic: federal courts should generally refrain from enjoining or o… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #8210

5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 44 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Thomas J.. Spargo v. New York State Commission On Judicial Conduct.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Thomas J.. Spargo v. New York State Commission On Judicial Conduct Anchor
ca2 · 2003
green “federal courts should generally refrain from enjoining or otherwise interfering in ongoing state proceedings.” 14
2 Diamond \D\" Construction Corp. v. Mcgowan"
· 2002
green “when younger applies, abstention is mandatory and its application deprives the federal court of jurisdiction in the matter.” 12
3 Diamond \D\" Construction Corp. v. Mcgowan"
· 2002
green “younger abstention is required when three conditions are met: (1) there is an ongoing state proceeding; (2) an important state interest is implicated in that proceeding; and (3) the state proceeding affords the federal plaintiff an adequate opportunity for judicial review of the…” 12
4 Falco v. Justices of the Matrimonial Parts of the Sup. Ct. of Suffolk Cnty.
ca2 · 2015
green “even if younger's prerequisites are satisfied, a federal court may exercise jurisdiction if the plaintiff can make a showing of 'bad faith, harassment or any other unusual circumstance that would call for equitable relief.” 4
5 Rivers v. Mcleod
ca2 · 2001
green “application of the younger doctrine is inappropriate where the litigant seeks money damages for an alleged violation of 1983 ...” 2

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check