Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 45 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Webb v. Special Electric Co., Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Webb v. Special Electric Co., Inc. Anchor | green | “the articulation and interpretation of california law . . . remains within the purview of the legislature and the courts of review.” | 9 |
| 2 | Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc. | green | “a provider of medical services rather than a mere seller or renter of the polar care device.” | 9 |
| 3 | Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc. | green | “causes of action based in negligence are not affected” | 9 |
| 4 | Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc. | green | “engler's claim for negligent failure to warn, as its name implies, required engler to prove that oasis had acted negligently.” | 9 |
| 5 | Garrett v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | green | “to ensure that the loss is borne not by injured consumers but by manufacturers, retailers and others in the chain of distribution who are better able to reduce the risks of injury and can equitably distribute the loss to the consuming public” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.