Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 44 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Goodman v. Harris County.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Goodman v. Harris County Anchor | green | “an expert may never render conclusions of law.” | 22 |
| 2 | David Owen v. Kerr-Mcgee Corporation and the Home Indemnity Company | green | “allowing an expert to give his opinion on the legal conclusions to be drawn from the evidence both invades the court's province and is irrelevant.” | 12 |
| 3 | Snap-Drape, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue | green | “allowing an expert to give his opinion on legal conclusions to be drawn from the evidence both invades the court's province and is irrelevant.” | 5 |
| 4 | David Owen v. Kerr-Mcgee Corporation and the Home Indemnity Company | green | “allowing an expert to give his opinion on legal conclusions to be drawn from the evidence both invades the court's province and is irrelevant.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.