Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 44 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Patti.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Patti Anchor | green | “an objective, disinterested, lay observer fully informed of the facts underlying the grounds on which recusal was sought would entertain a significant doubt about the judge's impartiality.” | 16 |
| 2 | United States v. Patti | green | “whether an objective, disinterested, lay observer fully informed of the facts underlying the grounds on which recusal was sought would entertain a significant doubt about the judge's impartiality.” | 16 |
| 3 | United States v. Frank Dennis Felix | green | “a judge, having been assigned to a case, should not recuse himself on unsupported, irrational, or highly tenuous speculation.” | 5 |
| 4 | Chairs v. Morgan County Sheriff | green | “in good faith all reasonable efforts to comply” | 4 |
| 5 | Usama Mohamed El-Abaidy v. U.S. Attorney General | green | “dumped them into a big pile of a mess in a laundry bin” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.