Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 44 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. Aragon.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. Aragon Anchor | green | “a reviewing court usurps the agency's function when it sets aside the administrative determination upon a ground not theretofore presented and deprives the agency of an opportunity to consider the matter, make its ruling, and state the reasons for its action.” | 21 |
| 2 | Cemex v. United States | green | “the court of international trade shall, where appropriate, require the exhaustion of administrative remedies.” | 9 |
| 3 | Rhone Poulenc S.A. v. United States | green | “it appears that it would have been futile for plaintiffs to argue that the agency should not apply its own regulation” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.