Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 44 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from James D. WEAVER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | James D. WEAVER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee Anchor | green | “the alj must cite some other evidence for denying a claim for pain in addition to personal observation” | 11 |
| 2 | Daniel L. Smith v. William A. Halter, Commissioner of Social Security | green | “decision must contain specific reasons for the weight given to the individual's symptoms, be consistent with and supported by the evidence, and be clearly articulated so the individual and any subsequent reviewer can assess how the adjudicator evaluated the individual's symptoms.” | 10 |
| 3 | Siterlet v. Secretary of Health & Human Services | green | “tolerance of pain is a highly individual matter and a determination of disability based on pain by necessity depends largely on the credibility of the claimant,” | 8 |
| 4 | Maxmilliano VILLARREAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee | green | “tolerance of pain is a highly individual matter and a determination of disability based on pain by necessity depends largely on the credibility of the claimant," and an alj's credibility finding "should not lightly be discarded.” | 7 |
| 5 | Masch v. Barnhart | green | “the alj need not analyze all seven factors identified in the regulation but should provide enough assessment to assure a reviewing court that he or she considered all relevant evidence” | 5 |
| 6 | Vance v. Commissioner of Social Security | green | “a diagnosis of fibromyalgia does not automatically entitle a claimant to disability benefits” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.