Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 44 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Baghdasaryan v. Holder.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baghdasaryan v. Holder Anchor | green | “an applicant alleging past persecution has the burden of establishing that (1) his treatment rises to the level of persecution; (2) the persecution was on account of one or more protected grounds; and (3) the persecution was committed by the government, or by forces that the gov…” | 18 |
| 2 | Rene Lopez Rodriguez v. Eric H. Holder Jr. | green | “where the bia conducts its own review of the evidence and law, rather than adopting the ij's decision, our review is limited to the bia's decision, except to the extent the ij's opinion is expressly adopted.” | 16 |
| 3 | Baghdasaryan v. Holder | green | “committed by the government, or by forces that the government was unable or unwilling to control.” | 5 |
| 4 | Baghdasaryan v. Holder | green | “the persecution was committed by the government, or by forces that the government was unable or unwilling to control.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.