Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 284 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Southmark Corporation v. Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Southmark Corporation v. Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P Anchor | green | “a proceeding is core under section 157 if it invokes a substantive right provided by title 11 or if it is a proceeding that, by its nature, could arise only in the context of a bankruptcy case.” | 86 |
| 2 | Badami v. Sears (In Re AFY, Inc.) | green | “unless and until the supreme court visits other provisions of section 157(b)(2), we take the supreme court at its word and hold that the balance of the authority granted to bankruptcy judges by congress in 28 u.s.c. 157 (b)(2) is constitutional.” | 81 |
| 3 | Southmark Corporation v. Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P | green | “a proceeding is core under 157 if it invokes a substantive right provided by title 11 or if it is a proceeding that, by its nature, could arise only in the context of a bankruptcy case.” | 59 |
| 4 | Stern v. Marshall | green | “lacked the constitutional authority to enter a final judgment on a state law counterclaim that is not resolved in the process of ruling on a creditor's proof of claim.” | 29 |
| 5 | Philippe Tanguy v. William West | green | “unless and until the supreme court visits other provisions of section 157(b)(2), we take the supreme court at its word and hold that the balance of the authority granted to bankruptcy judges by congress in 28 u.s.c. 157 (b)(2) is constitutional.” | 25 |
| 6 | First National Bank v. Crescent Electric Supply Co. (In Re Renaissance Hospital Grand Prairie Inc.) | green | “stem's 'in one isolated respect' language may understate the totality of the encroachment upon the judicial branch posed by section 157(b)(2) ....” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.