Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 44 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from BANK ONE, TX, NA v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Amer..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BANK ONE, TX, NA v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Amer. Anchor | green | “must establish 'beyond peradventure all of the essential elements of the claim or defense.” | 27 |
| 2 | Gilbert Texas Construction, L.P. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London | green | “if the insurer proves that an exclusion applies, the burden shifts back to the insured to show that an exception to the exclusion brings the claim back within coverage.” | 14 |
| 3 | Valcho v. Dallas County Hospital District | green | “when this court denies rather than grants summary judgment, it typically does not set out in detail the evidence that creates a genuine issue of material fact.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.