Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 43 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Vince Mullins v. Direct Digital, LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vince Mullins v. Direct Digital, LLC Anchor | green | “defined clearly and based on objective criteria.” | 26 |
| 2 | City Of Chicago v. Retired Chicago Police Association | green | “directs the district court to focus on whether the named representatives' claims have the same essential characteristics as the claims of the class at large.” | 11 |
| 3 | City Of Chicago v. Retired Chicago Police Association | green | “have the same essential characteristics as the claims of the class at large.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.