Topic: a district court may deny leave to amend if there are compe… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #8421

6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 43 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Douglas Reuter v. Jax Ltd., Inc..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Douglas Reuter v. Jax Ltd., Inc. Anchor
ca8 · 2013
green “a district court may deny leave to amend if there are compelling reasons such as undue delay, bad faith, or dilatory motive, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the non-moving party, or futility of the amendment.” 17
2 Douglas Reuter v. Jax Ltd., Inc.
ca8 · 2013
green “if there are compelling reasons such as undue delay, bad faith, or dilatory motive, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the non-moving party, or futility of the amendment.” 7
3 Keith A. Knoth v. Smith & Nephew Richards, A/K/A Smith & Nephew North America
ca8 · 1999
green “when exceptions to these deadlines are appropriate.” 5
4 Kozlov v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc.
ca8 · 2016
green “left to the sound discretion of the district court.” 5
5 Midwest Medical Solutions, LLC v. Exactech U.S., Inc.
ca8 · 2024
green “where there has been 'no change in the law, no newly discovered facts, or any other changed circumstance . . . after the scheduling deadline for amending pleadings,' then the court may conclude that the moving party has failed to show good cause.” 5
6 Midwest Medical Solutions, LLC v. Exactech U.S., Inc.
ca8 · 2024
green “if the reason for seeking the amendment is apparent before the deadline and no offsetting factors appear, the rule 16 deadline must govern.” 4

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check