Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 43 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bocanegra v. Vicmar Services, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bocanegra v. Vicmar Services, Inc. Anchor | green | “a trial court abuses its discretion when its ruling is based on an erroneous view of the law or a clearly erroneous assessment of the evidence.” | 18 |
| 2 | Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc. v. Cage (In Re Ramba, Inc.) | green | “a factual finding is not clearly erroneous if it is plausible in the light of the record read as a whole.” | 12 |
| 3 | Perry v. Dearing (In Re Perry) | green | “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” | 10 |
| 4 | Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc. v. Cage (In Re Ramba, Inc.) | green | “if it is plausible in the light of the record read as a whole.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.