Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 277 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hollingsworth v. Perry.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hollingsworth v. Perry Anchor | green | “(1) no other adequate means exist to attain the relief he desires, (2) the party's right to issuance of the writ is clear and indisputable, and (3) the writ is appropriate under the circumstances.” | 90 |
| 2 | Ronald Madden v. Kevin Myers, Honorable Malcolm Muir, United States District Judge, Nominal | green | “must have no other adequate means to obtain the desired relief, and must show that the right to issuance is clear and indisputable.” | 60 |
| 3 | Ronald Madden v. Kevin Myers, Honorable Malcolm Muir, United States District Judge, Nominal | green | “undue delay is tantamount to a failure to exercise jurisdiction.” | 48 |
| 4 | Ronald Madden v. Kevin Myers, Honorable Malcolm Muir, United States District Judge, Nominal | green | “undue delay is tantamount to a failure to exercise jurisdiction,” | 45 |
| 5 | Hollingsworth v. Perry | green | “before a writ of mandamus may issue, a party must establish that (1) no other adequate means exist to attain the relief he desires, (2) the party's right to issuance of the writ is clear and indisputable, and (3) the writ is appropriate under the circumstances.” | 28 |
| 6 | Hollingsworth v. Perry | green | “(1) no other adequate means exist to attain the relief he desires, (2) his right to issuance of the writ is clear and indisputable, and (3) the writ is appropriate under the circumstances.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.