Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 43 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bradshaw v. Carlson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bradshaw v. Carlson Anchor | green | “a federal prisoner ordinarily may not seek habeas corpus relief until he has exhausted all administrative remedies.” | 18 |
| 2 | Lamar Coleman v. United States Parole Commissio | green | “exhaustion is not required with regard to claims which turn only on statutory construction” | 16 |
| 3 | Kevin L. Barden v. Patrick Keohane, Warden | green | “the decision of the bop is subject to judicial review only for abuse of discretion” | 5 |
| 4 | Sebastian Eccleston v. United States | green | “the cares act does not mandate home confinement for any class of inmate.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.