Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 43 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Saunders v. Senkowski.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saunders v. Senkowski Anchor | green | “a properly filed application for state post-conviction or other collateral review with respect to the pertinent judgment or claim is pending.” | 25 |
| 2 | Kevin Smith v. Michael McGinnis Superintendent, Southport Correctional Facility | green | “excludes time during which properly filed state relief applications are pending, but does not reset the date from which the one-year statute of limitations begins to run.” | 18 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.