Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 1,166 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Forbes v. Edgar.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Forbes v. Edgar Anchor | green | “reasonable measures to meet a substantial risk of serious harm.” | 221 |
| 2 | George Walker v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. | green | “not entitled to demand specific care,” | 195 |
| 3 | George Walker v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. | green | “defer to medical professionals' treatment decisions unless there is evidence that no minimally competent professional would have so responded under those circumstances.” | 183 |
| 4 | John Doe v. Purdue University | green | “know about the conduct and facilitate it, approve it, condone it, or turn a blind eye.” | 130 |
| 5 | Adrian Thomas v. James Blackard | green | “a culpability standard akin to criminal recklessness.” | 129 |
| 6 | Scott Hildreth v. Kim Butler | green | “negligence, gross negligence, or even recklessness as the term is used in tort cases is not enough” | 119 |
| 7 | Swanson v. Citibank, N.A. | green | “putting a few words on paper that, in the hands of an imaginative reader, might suggest that something has happened . . . that might be redressed by the law” | 87 |
| 8 | Forbes v. Edgar | green | “reasonable measures to meet a substantial risk of serious harm” | 61 |
| 9 | Gloria J. McCaskill v. Sci Management Corporation, Sci Illinois Services Incorporated, Doing Business as Evergreen Cemetery, Sam Smith | green | “the mere failure . . . to choose the best course of action does not amount to a constitutional violation.” | 41 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.