Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 43 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Lamont Donnell Sholar.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Lamont Donnell Sholar Anchor | green | “a defendant need not prove the outcome would 'more likely than not' be different in order to establish prejudice in ineffective assistance cases.” | 20 |
| 2 | State v. Ginger M. Breitzman | green | “the factual circumstances of the case and trial counsel's conduct and strategy are findings of fact, which will not be overturned unless clearly erroneous; whether counsel's conduct constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we review de novo.” | 9 |
| 3 | State v. Walters | green | “examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law, used a demonstrated rational process, and reached a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach.” | 6 |
| 4 | State v. George E. Savage | green | “courts afford great deference to trial counsel's conduct, presuming that it 'falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.” | 5 |
| 5 | State v. Smith | green | “an objective standard of reasonableness.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.