Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 42 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sun Buick, Inc. v. Saab Cars Usa, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sun Buick, Inc. v. Saab Cars Usa, Inc. Anchor | green | “no case from the supreme court . . . holding that a case can be removed from an administrative agency to federal court on the grounds that the administrative agency is functionally a court” | 7 |
| 2 | Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, Ex Rel. Darryl Richardson v. U.S. West Communications, Inc., a Colorado Corporation | green | “it does not follow that because upshur county held that a court is not necessarily a 'court' for removal purposes, the supreme court has endorsed the view that an administrative agency might be a 'court' for removal purposes.” | 7 |
| 3 | Hodges v. Demchuk | green | “a motion to remand the case on the basis of any defect other than lack of subject matter jurisdiction must be made within 30 days after the filing of the notice of removal under section 1446(a).” | 7 |
| 4 | Weimer v. City of Johnstown, NY | green | “and defendants' removal petition was not without persuasive support.” | 7 |
| 5 | MBIA Ins. Corp. v. Royal Bank of Canada | green | “assessment of costs and fees against the removing defendants is within the court's discretion and does not require a finding of bad faith or frivolity.” | 7 |
| 6 | Wade v. Burns | green | “the second circuit has not directly addressed the question of whether a particular state agency qualifies as a state court for purposes of removal.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.