Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 43 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Miller v. County of Centre.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Miller v. County of Centre Anchor | green | “is to ascertain and effectuate the intention of the general assembly.” | 14 |
| 2 | Frazier v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board | green | “we should not insert words into a statute that are plainly not there.” | 13 |
| 3 | Pa School Boards Ass'n, Inc. v. Com., Public Sch. Employees'retirement Bd. | green | “other interpretative rules of statutory construction are to be utilized only where the statute at issue is ambiguous” | 7 |
| 4 | Pa School Boards Ass'n, Inc. v. Com., Public Sch. Employees'retirement Bd. | green | “other interpretive rules of statutory construction are to be utilized only where the statute at issue is ambiguous” | 5 |
| 5 | Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Department of Labor & Industry | green | “our standard of review is de novo, and our scope of review plenary.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.