Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 43 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Thuneibat v. Syrian Arab Republic.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thuneibat v. Syrian Arab Republic Anchor | green | “section 1605a explicitly provides that foreign state-sponsors of terrorism are liable to victims for economic losses stemming from injuries or death sustained as a result of the foreign state's conduct.” | 15 |
| 2 | Roth v. Islamic Republic of Iran | green | “reasonableness and foundation of the assumptions relied upon by the expert.” | 10 |
| 3 | Moradi v. Islamic Republic of Iran | green | “solatium damages, like damages for pain and suffering, are by their very nature unquantifiable.” | 7 |
| 4 | Moradi v. Islamic Republic of Iran | green | “are by their very nature unquantifiable.” | 6 |
| 5 | Khaliq v. Republic of Sudan | green | “awards for pain and suffering and solatium are calculated without reference to the time elapsed since the attacks.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.